Home Print this page Email this page   Users Online: 211

 

Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 76-81

A comparative clinical and quantitative evaluation of the efficacy of conventional and recent gingival retraction systems: An in vitro study


1 Department of Prosthodontics, Shree Bankey Bihari Dental College, Ghaziabad, Saudi Arabia
2 Santosh Dental College, Ghaziabad, Saudi Arabia
3 Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Salman bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
4 Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Salman bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
5 Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence Address:
Deepti Raghav
Department of Prosthodontics, Shree Bankey Bihari Dental College and Research Centre, Masuri, Ghaziabad - 201302, Uttar Pradesh
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2347-4610.140514

Rights and Permissions

Aim: Gingival deflection techniques can be classified as mechanical, mechanochemical, surgical, or any combination. Comparative evaluations of gingival retraction systems are done rarely mainly because there is no consensus on the evaluation criteria. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of three different gingival retraction systems, i.e., Magic Foam Cord, expasyl paste, and aluminium chloride-impregnated retraction cord. Materials and Methods: Following impressions, obtained casts were measured for gingival sulcus opening width under optical microscope (with imaging system software). The presence of bleeding after removal of material, ease of procedure, and patient's comfort were also evaluated. The data collected were tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis. Results and Conclusion: Evaluation of the clinical efficacy is relatively difficult because of the lack of appropriate measuring tool. In addition, choice of appropriate gingival retraction system is still a dilemma for the operator. Moreover, a particular clinical situation may indicate the specific technique.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4415    
    Printed103    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded800    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal